A poem by
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
A Psalm of Life
Tell me not in mournful numbers,
"Life is but an empty dream!"
For the soul is dead that slumbers,
And things are not what they seem.
Life is real! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal;
"Dust thou art, to dust returnest,"
Was not spoken of the soul.
Not enjoyment, and not sorrow,
Is our destined end or way;
But to act, that each to-morrow
Find us further than to-day.
Art is long, and Time is fleeting,
And our hearts, though stout and brave,
Still, like muffled drums, are beating
Funeral marches to the grave.
In the world's broad field of battle,
In the bivouac of Life,
Be not like dumb, driven cattle!
Be a hero in the strife!
Trust no Future, howe'er pleasant!
Let the dead Past bury its dead!
Act -- act in the living Present!
Heart within, and God o'erhead!
Lives of great men all remind us
We can make our lives sublime,
And, departing, leave behind us
Footprints on the sands of time;
Footprints, that perhaps another,
Sailing o'er life's solemn main,
A forlorn and shipwrecked brother,
Seeing, shall take heart again.
Let us, then, be up and doing,
With a heart for any fate;
Still achieving, still pursuing,
Learn to labour and to wait.
~Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
Do any of you recognize any part of it… you should. The two parts I’m
talking about are word for word in one of our degrees! I would love to know
how it got there. Did he help write the ritual? Was it added to our ritual
later?
MASONIC BIRTHDAYS
James Miller 4/13/1966 - 42 yrs.
Joe Monaghan P.M. 4/28/1966 – 42 yrs.
Troy Tomlinson 4/14/1993 - 15 yrs.
Charles Bopp 4/12/1995 - 13 yrs.
Louis Robinson 4/23/1997- 11 yrs.
Jerry Embree 4/26/2000 - 08 yrs.
David Brassieur 4/25/2007 – 1 yr.
Aaron Ronskley 4/25/2007 – 1 yr.
Trestle Board
Thanks to Kathrine Michel, wife of departed Bro. Joe Michel and her sons, Rex, Terry and Don. They made a donation to our building fund in memory of my mother Thelma Kueck.
Most months I get our newsletter printed at Pip’s Printing in Harahan. Ronnie Thibodeaux, the owner, has always been generous in his price structure but now he gone the extra distance. Ronnie told me he just wants to help and that since we were a non-profit there would no longer be any charge for the newsletter. I said we will at least buy the paper and I purchased a few reams. I just email him the document and in a few hour I pick it up! Ronnie also printed our 160 year program, Germanfest tickets and other items at a most reasonable price. If you have any printing needs please give this business an opportunity. He has been most gracious, generous and helpful to us. kkueck
PIP PRINTING
RONNIE THIBODEAUX
504-733-1747
THE HISTORICAL NEW ORLEANS COLLECTION
Ever wonder about the granite blocks on the officer’s chairs? I asked
Daniel Hammer, one of the researchers at the New Orleans collection, if
he could research our minutes from that period and possibly shed a little
light on them. I have always been mystified at them because they were given
to our lodge during the Civil War. Could they be from a soldier, a Yankee
in occupation possibly or just a dedicated lodge brother. He has agreed
to give a talk to us at the April 9 meeting about this very subject and
anything else he has found in our minutes that he feels we might be interested
in. This is a rare opportunity to peek into the hearts and mindset of our
forefathers. The last person to translate any of our old records of old
German script was Bro. Arturo deHoyoa who translated our old ritual back
in 1995. Daniel is to talk for approximately 30 minutes and then have a
question and answer session. He may also have some information on Charles
F. Buck, our most famous past master. Brothers this is what it is all about!
Don’t miss this important, exciting and enlightening meeting.
![]() |
||||||||
|
|
Zeal for the Instution
By W. Bro. James Dillman
The first line of the Indiana Master Mason charge states, "Your
zeal for the institution of Masonry . . . has pointed you out as a proper
object of our favor and esteem." This comes on the heels of the
Entered Apprentice charge which informs a newly initiated Mason that,
"A zealous approach to these duties (to God, our neighbor, and
ourselves) will insure public and private esteem." The third section
of the Entered Apprentice lecture once again invokes the word zeal by
reminding the brother that, "Entered Apprentices served their Master
in former times, and should in modern times, with freedom, fervency,
and zeal." Consequently, it seems reasonable to conclude that a
zealous approach to Freemasonry is one that is universally admired in
Masonic circles and results in the greatest benefit to the individual
brother and the fraternity at large. A closer examination of Masonic
principles reveals that is not necessarily the case.
Those familiar with the Preston-Webb ritual know that one of the first
lessons we are taught in Freemasonry is the necessity of keeping our
passions within due bounds. It is one of the overriding themes of the
Entered Apprentice degree and is reinforced in both the Fellowcraft
and Master Mason degrees. Every new Mason is instructed that he represents
a point surrounded by an imaginary circle that serves as a boundary
line beyond which his passions, prejudices, and interests are never
to stray. The tenets of Freemasonry, a brother's own conscience, and
even Grand Lodge regulations attempt to define exactly where that boundary
line is drawn, yet in practice we discover there really is no line.
There are only parameters which are inherently subjective and largely
dependent upon individual interpretation.
The lessons in the ritual appear to be sending mixed signals. On one
hand, a brother's zeal for the institution earns him favor and esteem
while on the other, a failure to regulate his passions may subject him
to the contempt of his brethren. The brother who aggressively seeks
change in Freemasonry yet maintains a strong desire to adhere to Masonic
principles must strike a delicate balance between the two. This is a
particularly timely topic as our fraternity encounters dwindling numbers,
decreasing influence in our communities, and what many perceive as a
departure from the practice of true Freemasonry. In our efforts to meet
these challenges head-on, we have experimented with new methods of degree
conferrals and relaxed proficiency requirements. Discussions abound
regarding membership campaigns, dues, Masonic education, fundraisers,
etc. Not surprisingly, there is significant disagreement as to how we
should proceed.
Freemasonry is supposed to be a gentle craft, free of envy and discord.
I wonder, however, whether the lack of zeal for the institution is not
at the heart of many of our problems. Has the laid-back demeanor we
are expected to maintain curtailed the sense of urgency we should all
be feeling? Has it encouraged apathy? Should those who have a sincere
passion for our craft continue to sit idly and patiently by and be satisfied
with the status quo while the fraternity wallows in the doldrums? Silence
and circumspection are indeed virtues that have their proper place in
our Masonic characters, but they are not effective avenues for addressing
issues that rob modern Freemasonry of its potential. Freemasonry has
suffered much more from errors of omission than it has from errors of
commission. An ever- growing number of Freemasons look at the current
state of Freemasonry as a call to arms against indifference, innovation,
and tired old thinking. They stand ready to infuse the craft with the
zeal that made Freemasonry the world's greatest and most popular fraternity.
This new brand of zeal has not been met with open arms by many brethren
including some of the occupants of Freemasonry's bully pulpits. Generational
gaps, failure to embrace the internet age, and a puzzling acceptance
of the current state of Freemasonry stand in the way of its return to
prominence. More and more, proponents for change are subjected to censorship
and even suspension from the fraternity. Freemasonry faces a myriad
of problems that are serious threats to its future. Solving these problems
involves making hard decisions that many will not agree with. It likewise
leads to spirited debate that can foster the kind of overzealousness
we are cautioned against. I am not a subscriber to "the Grand Master's
mother wears army boots" school of thought. Personal attacks and
invective have no place in a fraternity founded on the principle of
brotherly love and every effort should be made to avoid them. That said,
it is not a Masonic offense to demand accountability from our leaders
who have been handed the reins of Freemasonry and are charged with preserving
its reputation. Individual brothers would do well to temper their zeal
and subdue their passions. Grand Masters and others who hold sway over
the conduct of Masons would do equally well to avoid being thin-skinned
or poised with regulation books in hand, ready to pounce upon any sign
of dissent.
When perusing a list of famous Freemasons, we see the names of many
of our founding fathers, thirteen U.S. Presidents, great generals, astronauts,
inventors, and scientists. While I know very little about the Masonic
careers of most of these men, the one common thread they share is that
they were men of action. They were not afraid to act boldly and decisively
when the situation called for it. While we should neither speak just
to hear the sound of our own voices nor throw caution to the wind, Freemasonry
never needed men of action more than it does right now. Freemasonry
has arrived at a critical crossroads. While it is paramount that we
remain conscious of that circle that surrounds us at all times, we should
not be afraid to display the zeal for the institution that merited us
the honor of becoming Master Masons.
- Source: Knights of the North Masonic Dictionary sent in by W.M.
Revelle
|
|
|